🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that began as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where Black people are compensated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The tide has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has developed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the month is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it develops is a instructive case in how co-option leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A campaign to erase Black history and narrative from the archives is in progress. One of the former president's first executive orders focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how minimally it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the conditions of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not evade politics, and provides room for people, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has simple recognition of the past when it fails to address the current situation of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.